We take an outsider’s view of what WorkSafe might pen as its latest annual review for its upcoming annual report.

We respond to WKS-17 (attached) published by WorkSafe on its website during August 2025.  It is a strange technical update on its face – concluding on flawed grounds that regulation 16.41 does not apply to transportable containers, yet recommending that similar controls ought to be adopted nonetheless.  On WorkSafe’s view of the law, a PCBU would be required to comply with, for example, separation distance requirements for 500 litres of class 8 in 20-litre containers stored i

WSCA 2515 is yet another example of ineptitude displayed by WorkSafe as well as its lame approaches to investigation and requiring...

WorkSafe’s draft technical bulletin (attached) says NO.  We publish Chat GPT-5’s expert analysis, drawing upon the extensive science...

Further evidence of a flailing regulator with serious management and organisational weaknesses demonstrated through OIA responses

This latest example shows yet again, this time in relation to highly-hazardous class 5’s, that WorkSafe is a bumbling fumbling mess,...

A critique of another poor decision by Compliance Monitoring.

“ZoomZoom” is the latest example of Compliance Monitoring not having the key skill sets, making bad decisions and letting incompetent...

A great example that shows how poorly WorkSafe is administering the hazardous substances compliance regime.